2001年2月10日 星期六

Herbert A. Simon Dies at 84 (紐約時報)


此篇後來重複
紐約時報

Herbert A. Simon Dies at 84; Won a Nobel for Economics


Published: February 10, 2001
Herbert A. Simon, an American polymath who won the Nobel in economics in 1978 with a new theory of decision making and who helped pioneer the idea that computers can exhibit artificial intelligence that mirrors human thinking, died yesterday. He was 84.
He died at the Presbyterian University Hospital of Pittsburgh, according to an announcement by Carnegie Mellon University, which said the cause was complications after surgery last month. Mr. Simon was the Richard King Mellon University Professor of Computer Science and Psychology at the university -- a title that underscored the breadth of his interests and learning.
Mr. Simon also won the A. M. Turing Award for his work on computer science in 1975 and the National Medal of Science in 1986. In 1993, he was awarded the American Psychological Association's award for outstanding lifetime contributions to psychology.
In 1994, he became one of only 14 foreign scientists ever to be inducted into the Chinese Academy of Sciences and in 1995 was given awards by the International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence and the American Society of Public Administration.
Awarding him the Nobel, the Swedish Academy of Sciences cited ''his pioneering research into the decision-making process within economic organizations'' and acknowledged that ''modern business economics and administrative research are largely based on Simon's ideas.''
Professor Simon challenged the classical economic theory that economic behavior was essentially rational behavior in which decisions were made on the basis of all available information with a view to securing the optimum result possible for each decision maker.
Instead, Professor Simon contended that in today's complex world individuals cannot possibly process or even obtain all the information they need to make fully rational decisions. Rather, they try to make decisions that are good enough and that represent reasonable or acceptable outcomes.
He called this less ambitious view of human decision making ''bounded rationality'' or ''intended rational behavior''這詞待查 and described the results it brought as ''satisficing.''
In his book ''Administrative Behavior'' he set out the implications of this approach, rejecting the notion of an omniscient ''economic man'' capable of making decisions that bring the greatest benefit possible and substituting instead the idea of ''administrative man'' who ''satisfices -- looks for a course of action that is satisfactory or 'good enough.' ''
Professor Simon's interest in decision making led him logically into the fields of computer science, psychology and political science. His belief that human decisions were made within clear constraints seemed to conform with the way that computers are programmed to resolve problems with defined parameters.
In the mid-1950's, he teamed up with Allen Newell of the Rand Corporation to study human decision making by trying to simulate it on computers, using a strategy he called thinking aloud.
People were asked for the general reasoning processes they went through as they solved logical problems and these were then converted into computer programs that Professor Simon and Mr. Newell thought equipped these machines with a kind of artificial intelligence that enabled them to simulate human thought rather than just perform stereotyped procedures.
The breakthrough came in December 1955 when Professor Simon and his colleague succeeded in writing a computer program that could prove mathematical theorems taken from the Bertrand Russell and Alfred North Whitehead classic on mathematical logic, ''Principia Mathematica.''
The following January, Professor Simon celebrated this discovery by walking into a class and announcing to his students, ''Over the Christmas holiday, Al Newell and I invented a thinking machine.''
A subsequent letter to Lord Russell explaining his achievement elicited the reply: ''I am delighted to know that 'Principia Mathematica' can now be done by machinery. I wish Whitehead and I had known of this possibility before we wasted 10 years doing it by hand.''
But in a much-cited 1957 paper Professor Simon seemed to allow his own enthusiasm for artificial intelligence to run too far ahead of its more realistic possibilities. Within 10 years, he predicted, ''a digital computer will be the world's chess champion unless the rules bar it from competition,'' while within the ''visible future,'' he said, ''machines that think, that learn and that create'' will be able to handle challenges ''coextensive with the range to which the human mind has been applied.''
Sure enough, the I.B.M computer Deep Blue did finally beat the world chess champion Gary Kasparov last year -- about three decades after Mr. Simon had predicted the event would occur.
Because artificial intelligence has not grown as quickly or as strongly as Professor Simon hoped, critics of his thinking argue that there are limits to what computers can achieve and that what they accomplish will always be a simulation of human thought, not creative thinking itself. As a result, Professor Simon's achievements have sparked a passionate and continuing debate about the differences between people and thinking machines.
Born on June 15, 1916, the son of German immigrants, in Milwaukee, Herbert A. Simon attended public school and entered the University of Chicago in 1933 with the intention of bringing the same rigorous methodology to the social sciences as existed in physics and other ''hard'' sciences.
As an undergraduate his interest in decision making was aroused when he made a field study of Milwaukee's recreation department. After receiving his bachelor's degree in 1936 he became an assistant to Clarence E. Ridley of the International City Managers Association and then continued work on administrative techniques in the Bureau of Public Administration of the University of California at Berkeley.
In 1942, he moved to the Illinois Institute of Technology and in 1943 received his doctorate from the University of Chicago for a dissertation subsequently published in 1947 as ''Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organizations.''
In 1937, he married Dorothea Pye, who survives him along with three children, Katherine Simon Frank of Minneapolis; Peter A. Simon of Bryan, Tex.; and Barbara M. Simon of Wilder, Vt.; six grandchildren, three step-grandchildren; and five great-grandchildren.
A member of the faculty of Carnegie Mellon University since 1949, Professor Simon played important roles in the formation of several departments and schools including the Graduate School of Industrial Administration, the School of Computer Science and the College of Humanities and Social Sciences' psychology department.
He published 27 books, of which the best known today are ''Models of Bounded Rationality'' (1997), ''Sciences of the Artificial''(1996) and ''Administrative Behavior''(1997 管理行為).
In 1991 he published his autobiography, ''Models of My Life,'' and remarked then about his vision of that all-vanquishing computer hunched over the chess boards of the world: ''I still feel good about my prediction. Only the time frame was a bit short.'' And so it was.

2000年7月29日 星期六

H. A. Simon:稻草堆最銳利的針〝The Needle and the Haystack〞;動態的 a needle in a haystack

H. A. Simon:稻草堆最銳利的針〝The Needle and the Haystack〞;動態的 a needle in a haystack

這是H. A. Simon喜歡用的 search 之比喻:

a needle in a haystack


something that is impossible or extremely difficult to find, especially because the area you have to search is too large:
Finding the piece of paper I need in this huge pile of documents is like looking for/trying to find a needle in a haystack
21世紀開發萬用流感疫苗的人,因為流感病毒會不斷的"演化"出新一代,所以他們形容自己的任務,像是要從移動的草堆要找出"藏針":


The push to develop a universal flu vaccine has intensified in recent years, given unusually severe flu outbreaks and emerging pandemic strains, like the swine flu.
But it has been a slow process, partly because researchers are testing multiple strategies as the virus continues to mutate, says Saint Louis University professor of infectious disease and internal medicine Daniel Hoft."It's like running after a haystack that's on the back of a wagon," says Hoft, who is leading the Hotel Influenza study. "And it's moving while you're looking for the needle."~Researchers are stepping up efforts to develop a “universal” flu vaccine. 


2000/7/29 www.deming.com.tw home page (partially)
稻草堆最銳利的針


The Needle and the Haystack( Sharpest needle among the haystack.)

2000年6月28日開始練習徒步上下班。下班前不忘進「誠品台大店逛」,幸遇 Andrea Gabor(US News and World Report記者)新書 The Capitalist Philosophers,此記者1990出《戴明傳-發現品質的人(The Man Who Discovered Quality-How W. Edwards Deming Brought the Quality Revolution to America-The Stories of Ford, Xerox, and GM)》,介紹各家,頗有功力;她前數年出《愛因斯坦的女人們》,有中文本。這本《資本主義哲學家們》寫的是一些管理學家(似乎想學暢銷書 The Worldly Philosophers by Robert L. Heibroner,記些經濟學家),戴明和司馬賀都名列其中。此書味道與我較相投。

H. A. Simon一章標題為〝The Needle and the Haystack〞,形容司馬賀是位天才,尤其50年代卡內基理工學院(後來改制為卡內基-梅隆大學,)工業管理研究學院(GSIA)群英會,智識份子和社會科學家的理想國,其中司馬賀猶如稻草堆中藏的一隻最銳利的。他的朋友其得大獎寫道:「吾以但求滿意(satisficing)搜索稻草堆,竟遇稻草堆最銳利的針…」奇人也-資訊時代中的文藝復興式人。

徒步上班,四十年如一日

2000年6月26日讀朱新民和李亦菲合著的《架設人與計算機的橋樑-西蒙的認知與管理心理學》武漢:湖北教育出版社,2000。朱先生是司馬賀 在大陸「例中學」計畫的主要合作者。曾去卡內基-梅隆大學(CMU)研究兩次。1989年天安門革命,司馬賀停留北京二天,與朱先生談論半天。

這次讀此書,肯定司馬賀先生自傳中的「步行上班已繞地球八圈」-司馬賀家距CMU約 3公里,每天上下學必徒步,四十年如一日,風雨無阻。

這最能表現此英才了不起的毅力。